Latest & Most Recent Finance News

Economy & Politics
In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a group of shareholders is all set to sue the company on account of financial losses of $13 billion. According to the shareholders, the group deliberately hid its conflict of interest while creating securities of subprime nature just before the 2008 financial crisis. According to the specific details, shareholders have accused the group of deliberately concealing the facts related to the collateralized debt obligations so as to specifically benefit the hedge funds. Once this truth was revealed, the stock prices of Goldman Sachs fell sharply, thereby bringing a lot of financial loss to the shareholders. There is no official comment from Goldman and the lawyer representing the case of the shareholders, Darren Robbins says that they are ready to take the case further which has been in limbo for 11 years now. The case had been in the Supreme court of the country which, in its observation in June earlier this year, said that lower courts could use their common sense and expert testimony to finally decide whether the stock prices had been affected by this move of the group or not. Crotty dismissed Goldman’s claims that its statements about its business interest including the ones in which the group claims that the client interest always come first and honesty and integrity at the heart of their business are very generic statements and cannot mislead the investors or affect the stock prices of the company. The judge noted that generic statements from the group could even lead to reinforcing misconceptions among investors, and there is no evidence offered by Goldman that its stock prices would have remained intact had it disclosed its conflicts of interest to shareholders.
Industry News
In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a group of shareholders is all set to sue the company on account of financial losses of $13 billion. According to the shareholders, the group deliberately hid its conflict of interest while creating securities of subprime nature just before the 2008 financial crisis. According to the specific details, shareholders have accused the group of deliberately concealing the facts related to the collateralized debt obligations so as to specifically benefit the hedge funds. Once this truth was revealed, the stock prices of Goldman Sachs fell sharply, thereby bringing a lot of financial loss to the shareholders. There is no official comment from Goldman and the lawyer representing the case of the shareholders, Darren Robbins says that they are ready to take the case further which has been in limbo for 11 years now. The case had been in the Supreme court of the country which, in its observation in June earlier this year, said that lower courts could use their common sense and expert testimony to finally decide whether the stock prices had been affected by this move of the group or not. Crotty dismissed Goldman’s claims that its statements about its business interest including the ones in which the group claims that the client interest always come first and honesty and integrity at the heart of their business are very generic statements and cannot mislead the investors or affect the stock prices of the company. The judge noted that generic statements from the group could even lead to reinforcing misconceptions among investors, and there is no evidence offered by Goldman that its stock prices would have remained intact had it disclosed its conflicts of interest to shareholders.
Money
In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a group of shareholders is all set to sue the company on account of financial losses of $13 billion. According to the shareholders, the group deliberately hid its conflict of interest while creating securities of subprime nature just before the 2008 financial crisis. According to the specific details, shareholders have accused the group of deliberately concealing the facts related to the collateralized debt obligations so as to specifically benefit the hedge funds. Once this truth was revealed, the stock prices of Goldman Sachs fell sharply, thereby bringing a lot of financial loss to the shareholders. There is no official comment from Goldman and the lawyer representing the case of the shareholders, Darren Robbins says that they are ready to take the case further which has been in limbo for 11 years now. The case had been in the Supreme court of the country which, in its observation in June earlier this year, said that lower courts could use their common sense and expert testimony to finally decide whether the stock prices had been affected by this move of the group or not. Crotty dismissed Goldman’s claims that its statements about its business interest including the ones in which the group claims that the client interest always come first and honesty and integrity at the heart of their business are very generic statements and cannot mislead the investors or affect the stock prices of the company. The judge noted that generic statements from the group could even lead to reinforcing misconceptions among investors, and there is no evidence offered by Goldman that its stock prices would have remained intact had it disclosed its conflicts of interest to shareholders.
Technology News
In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a group of shareholders is all set to sue the company on account of financial losses of $13 billion. According to the shareholders, the group deliberately hid its conflict of interest while creating securities of subprime nature just before the 2008 financial crisis. According to the specific details, shareholders have accused the group of deliberately concealing the facts related to the collateralized debt obligations so as to specifically benefit the hedge funds. Once this truth was revealed, the stock prices of Goldman Sachs fell sharply, thereby bringing a lot of financial loss to the shareholders. There is no official comment from Goldman and the lawyer representing the case of the shareholders, Darren Robbins says that they are ready to take the case further which has been in limbo for 11 years now. The case had been in the Supreme court of the country which, in its observation in June earlier this year, said that lower courts could use their common sense and expert testimony to finally decide whether the stock prices had been affected by this move of the group or not. Crotty dismissed Goldman’s claims that its statements about its business interest including the ones in which the group claims that the client interest always come first and honesty and integrity at the heart of their business are very generic statements and cannot mislead the investors or affect the stock prices of the company. The judge noted that generic statements from the group could even lead to reinforcing misconceptions among investors, and there is no evidence offered by Goldman that its stock prices would have remained intact had it disclosed its conflicts of interest to shareholders.
Opinion
In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a group of shareholders is all set to sue the company on account of financial losses of $13 billion. According to the shareholders, the group deliberately hid its conflict of interest while creating securities of subprime nature just before the 2008 financial crisis. According to the specific details, shareholders have accused the group of deliberately concealing the facts related to the collateralized debt obligations so as to specifically benefit the hedge funds. Once this truth was revealed, the stock prices of Goldman Sachs fell sharply, thereby bringing a lot of financial loss to the shareholders. There is no official comment from Goldman and the lawyer representing the case of the shareholders, Darren Robbins says that they are ready to take the case further which has been in limbo for 11 years now. The case had been in the Supreme court of the country which, in its observation in June earlier this year, said that lower courts could use their common sense and expert testimony to finally decide whether the stock prices had been affected by this move of the group or not. Crotty dismissed Goldman’s claims that its statements about its business interest including the ones in which the group claims that the client interest always come first and honesty and integrity at the heart of their business are very generic statements and cannot mislead the investors or affect the stock prices of the company. The judge noted that generic statements from the group could even lead to reinforcing misconceptions among investors, and there is no evidence offered by Goldman that its stock prices would have remained intact had it disclosed its conflicts of interest to shareholders.
Forex Broker
In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a group of shareholders is all set to sue the company on account of financial losses of $13 billion. According to the shareholders, the group deliberately hid its conflict of interest while creating securities of subprime nature just before the 2008 financial crisis. According to the specific details, shareholders have accused the group of deliberately concealing the facts related to the collateralized debt obligations so as to specifically benefit the hedge funds. Once this truth was revealed, the stock prices of Goldman Sachs fell sharply, thereby bringing a lot of financial loss to the shareholders. There is no official comment from Goldman and the lawyer representing the case of the shareholders, Darren Robbins says that they are ready to take the case further which has been in limbo for 11 years now. The case had been in the Supreme court of the country which, in its observation in June earlier this year, said that lower courts could use their common sense and expert testimony to finally decide whether the stock prices had been affected by this move of the group or not. Crotty dismissed Goldman’s claims that its statements about its business interest including the ones in which the group claims that the client interest always come first and honesty and integrity at the heart of their business are very generic statements and cannot mislead the investors or affect the stock prices of the company. The judge noted that generic statements from the group could even lead to reinforcing misconceptions among investors, and there is no evidence offered by Goldman that its stock prices would have remained intact had it disclosed its conflicts of interest to shareholders.
- Banxso

Goldman Sachs to Face Class Action for Financial Loss to Investors

Tara Morgan
December 9, 2021
2 min read
18959

In the latest case against the Goldman Sachs Group, Paul Crotty, District Judge, Manhattan ruled that the group has to face legal proceedings as a... Details

Republicans Block Debt Limit Hike, Could Lead to Federal Shutdown

Jose Ware
September 29, 2021
2 min read
17686

For the second day in a row, Republicans in the US Senate blocked President Joe Biden’s bid to increase the debt limit of the government,... Details

The Investors at ByteDance Looking to Use Stakes for the Bid of TikTok

Jose Ware
August 24, 2020
2 min read
31915

The Beijing-based ByteDance is considering diverse options for the popular video-sharing app, TikTok, as there is enormous pressure from the US government to give up... Details

Credit Agricole acquires majority stake in fintech expert Linxo

Credit Agricole Agrees to Buy a Majority Stake in Linxo Group

Betty Taylor
January 28, 2020
2 min read
37270

Crédit Agricole, the French bank has announced on Tuesday that it is going to acquire more than 85% of stake in the fintech firm named... Details

$500,000 Raised in Seed Funding by Sarawak Based Sinisana Technologies

Nancy Harris
October 17, 2019
2 min read
38400

In a new development that is going to come as a huge boost to the startup scene in Malaysia and South Asia, Sinisana Technologies has... Details

Lyft Shares Surrender Gains on Second Day of Trading

David Walker
April 2, 2019
3 min read
42151

The initial public offering of ride-hailing company Lyft was the biggest one this year and considering the fact that it marked the debut of the... Details

Survey Finds One-Third of UK Firms Could Move Abroad Due to Brexit

Betty Taylor
February 1, 2019
3 min read
29088

In a development that must come as a bit of a shock for the United Kingdom, around one-third of the companies in the union are... Details

Category: Finance News